PMI Mortgage Center

The Collapse of the Debt Settlement Business: FTC to vote on revamped legislation.
An entire industry shouldn’t suffer for the lack of performance by merely a small amount of services. The regulators have in recent months put forth new limitations regarding the debt settlement industry that will be shown to be critical in the downfall of the sector if put into effect. A vote will occur in fall of this year with the issue of implementing laws that will benefit consumers searching for debt relief. But will it seriously aide people to almost terminate the method of signing up with a company to settle debts on their behalf?

The chief trade organizations helping debt negotiation/settlement companies have put money into research documents to decide the success and overall results of the debt settlement industry. Both TASC (The Association of settlement companies) and USOBA (United States Organization for Bankruptcy Alternatives) are trying to provide the serious benefits of debt settlement to the regulations and to prevent the legality of these heartwrenching regulations. 

Debt settlement companies work on consumers’ behalf to settle down unsecured debt, such as credit card debt, unsecured personal loans, lines of credit and medical bills. They work miracles for a portion of US residents with difficult hardships, such as health illnesses, unemployment, bad marriages, or the loss of a family member.

A lot of the amendments that the Federal Trade Commission is looking to implement—including a restriction of upfront fees— would in all reality terminate this viable method for consumers who are experiencing difficulty with high interest credit card debt. The Association of Settlement Companies outlined in a quick historical performance numbers the financial value its member companies give to clients enrolled in debt settlement programs, and it is neatly illustrated. For example, based on a current data research of its members, TASC shows its members negotiated more than 94,000 debts totaling more than $553 million in debt in the first 6 months of this year. This is an annual projected amount of more than $1.1 billion in debt negotiated by TASC members for just 2009. A multitude of other studies also in a very strait forward manner show the advantage of the debt settlement sector as a whole, showing the advantageous impact made on the economy in general.

USOBA has endorsed data compilations of the debt settlement industry by Dr. Richard A. Briesch, an Assistant Professor of Marketing at Southern Methodist University’s well known Cox School of Business, unfoiling the work named “Economic Factors and the Debt Management Industry” in the beginning of this month. He performed a single objective assessment of the advantage to US debtors, if any, put forth by debt settlement companies. In going over detailed sources of doubt in the debt settlement sector, one example is customer graduation rate of debt settlement programs, up-front fees, the quality of negotiators, and overall consumer benefit, Dr. Briesch came to the conclusion that debt negotiation can extend huge value and advantage people even beyond what consumer credit counseling can offer.

Dave Leuthold, Executive Director of TASC said “Debt settlement has been and should remain an option for the tens of thousands of consumers who are facing financial difficulties. Especially in this tough economic climate, consumers should have more financial tools at their disposal, not fewer.”

Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch of the FTC also confirms that the Debt Settlement industry has a crucial role to play as he said “For example, a debt settlement company can speak on the client’s behalf, especially in predicaments where consumers are reluctant , self-conscious, or even afraid to contact their collectors directly. A debt settlement company also may be able to give personalized care to clients, adopting a holistic approach to all of the consumer’s credit card debt owed to a multitude of creditors, rather than just the amount owed to an individual creditor. Taking care of the whole debt picture and putting attention on restoring the consumer’s economic health has always been a critical value proposition of debt management professionals.” Rosch moves further to talk about numerous recommendations to the industry that can aide in reducing the problems by consumers, seeing that it’s the complaints that stimulate the FTC and other regulators like the Attorney Generals’ offices, State Bar Associations, and the BBB to scrutinize, gather data, and come down on the agencies involved in the industry.

The FTC dosen’t need to set regulations in order to aide taxpayers because there are loads of sources to check when finding a good company to team up with. Also, understand that a service that is a partner of either TASC or USOBA would be a smarter choice because these organizations were begun to protect people and to make sure that their partner agencies are adhering to a higher authority.

Visibly, different services use differing plans and fee set ups that will work for different people according to their unique needs, but after the right research is conducted, the possibility of enrolling with a scammer company is drastically reduced, if not completely eliminated. Debt settlement has shown to be a program that benefits people; it would be a misstep to consumers to all out eliminate the industry by passing extremely strict restrictions.